skip to main content

NCBI ROFL: This research is, like, so helpful for like, interviews and stuff.

The interviewees' overuse of the word 'like' negatively impacts hiring decisions, making applicants seem less professional.

Written byncbi rofl
| 1 min read
Follow on GoogleGoogle News Preferred Source
Placeholder image

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

Placeholder image showing Earth from space with an alert icon and the message ‘This image is no longer available.’

Interviewees' overuse of the word "like" and hesitations: effects in simulated hiring decisions. "This study examined the use of hesitations and discourse markers such as "uh" and "like," sex of an interviewee, and professional or student participants on hiring decisions of job interviewees. Participants consisted of 105 students between the ages of 18 to 43 years and 71 professionals between the ages of 22 to 76 years (120 women, 56 men). Adult professionals and students were least likely to want to hire, perceived the applicant as less professional, and were less likely to recommend the interviewee for hiring if the interviewee overused the word "like" compared to "uh" or control. Professionals were less likely than students overall to want to hire interviewees across conditions. Sex of the interviewee was not found to be significant."

Placeholder image showing Earth from space with an alert icon and the message ‘This image is no longer available.’

Photo: flickr/bpsusf

Related content: Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Read [pause] thee uh abstract.

Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Perceptions of a tattooed college instructor.

Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Munich Oktoberfest experience: remarkable impact of sex and age in ethanol intoxication.

WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ

!

Meet the Author

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe