Health

The Placebo Effect: A Mystery in Potential Therapy

If your doctor gave you a pill that contained nothing but starch and water, yet your headache got better, you’ve experienced the placebo effect.

By Avery HurtJun 3, 2022 5:00 PM
Placebo effect
(Credit: ClareM/Shutterstock)

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news
 

A placebo is a medical treatment that doesn’t contain any kind of medicine. In fact, it contains no active ingredients at all. But in many cases, placebos can have a therapeutic and sometimes dramatic effect.

Doctors would give placebos to patients that had little else to offer or seemed to have nothing wrong with them. They might give a patient a tincture of sugar water, or a pill filled with nothing but sugar, hoping that the patient’s belief in the medicine or trust in the physician would help relieve the symptoms.

Placebos are also nothing new. In a letter to Caspar Wistar, Thomas Jefferson writes, “One of the most successful physicians I have ever known, has assured me that he used more of bread pills, drops of colored water, and powders of hickory ashes, than of all other medicines put together.”

The Placebo in Trials

When experts started to see medicine as more of a science and less of an art, they saw the true power of placebos — and measured it. In 1955, Henry Knowles Beecher first quantified the effect. Beecher was a Harvard Medical School anesthesiologist and published a paper in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Though experts question Beecher’s evidence and conclusions, they do not question his demonstration that placebos are necessary for drug trials.

To determine if a new drug is more effective than no therapy at all, researchers must account for the placebo effect. Simply receiving medicine is likely to influence some patients. Which suggests when testing a drug, a response does not necessarily mean the medicine is superior to doing nothing.

That’s why today’s “gold standard” of drug testing is the double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT). In an RCT, some of the patients receive the actual drug; others receive a placebo. Neither the researchers nor the patients know who gets the drug and who gets the placebo, hence the “double-blind.” Experts won’t approve a drug if it is not more effective than the placebo.

How it Works is Unknown

The placebo effect is not universal, though Beecher suggested that as many as 35 percent of people may be susceptible to the effect. Researchers have observed placebos producing changes in blood pressure and heart rate, as well as relieving pain, depression, anxiety and irritable bowel syndrome. Sham injections seem to work better than sham pills, large pills work better than small ones, and two pills are better than one. Studies have found that even the color of the pill can make a difference.

Placebos aren’t limited to pills and tinctures. In one study, a surgeon gave patients a sham knee surgery, where the surgeon made an incision, but did nothing to the knee before sewing it back up. The patients were just as likely to find relief as those who underwent the procedure.

It’s still a mystery how the placebo effect works. Some say it’s a matter of expectations. Some think it’s classical conditioning at work. We’re conditioned to feel better after taking medicine, so we do. The placebo effect on pain could be activating natural opioids in the brain as a response to the relationship between the physician and patient.

No Deceit Necessary

But one thing is not a mystery. For all the good a placebo might do, lying to patients is not ethical. In clinical trials, the participants know that they may be in the group that gets a placebo. Jefferson called the well-meant dispensing of bread pills and colored water “pious fraud.”

However, experts could take advantage of the placebo effect without fraud — pious or otherwise. One of the most intriguing things about placebos is that they can work even when patients know they’re getting a placebo.

Though placebos have been in use for centuries and have been a necessary part of clinical trials for decades, their reputation has waxed and waned, ranging from “kindly” to “dishonest, unethical and dangerous.” However, in the last few decades, researchers have begun taking a hard look at what’s behind the effect and how they might use it to directly benefit patients, not just test drugs. One day, you may choose a pill, knowing full well what’s not in it.

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!

Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Join
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

 
Subscribe
To The Magazine

Save up to 70% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2022 Kalmbach Media Co.