We have completed maintenance on DiscoverMagazine.com and action may be required on your account. Learn More

What is Dark Matter Made Of? These Are the Top Candidates

Decades out of the gate, scientists still don’t know what makes up the bulk of the universe’s matter. But they have some strong contenders.

By Adam Hadhazy
Nov 15, 2019 10:55 PMDec 13, 2019 4:17 PM
Dark Matter - Science Photo Library
(Credit: Volker Springel/Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics/Science Photo Library)


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

In the annals of science, it will go down as a contest for the ages: the race to discover dark matter. This elusive substance has mystified us since the 1930s, when astronomers first realized galaxies needed some kind of invisible gravitational glue to hold them together. No one knew what it was, so the name dark matter stuck. Beggaring belief, the universe seems to hold more than five times as much dark matter as it does “normal” matter. This means it should literally lurk right under our noses, permeating and penetrating Earth as our solar system swings through our galaxy, which (like most massive galaxies) is brimming with the stuff. 

Yet for all that seeming ubiquity, scientists know shockingly little about the universe’s dominant material. Dark matter could be made of one kind of particle or many. Those particles might be massively heavy or wispily light. We think it only interacts with other matter (and itself) via gravity, but dark matter could turn out to have interactions with any force of nature — known or unknown. 

Addressing all these possibilities, physicists have conjured up quite the stable of dark matter candidates. And like race horses, these proposed particle types are vying to win what you might call the Dark Matter Derby, competing through theories, experiments and observations. 

The current racecourse weaves from the grandest scales of the universe to the tiniest, from galaxies to subatomic particles. To reach the finish line first, researchers are often literally chilling out: Many of the experiments involve supercooling materials such as liquid xenon to subfreezing temperatures, which makes it easier for the materials’ atoms to bump into stray dark matter particles and thus betray the elusive galactic glue’s existence.

The odds-on favorite, called a WIMP (for weakly interacting massive particle), has been a no-show despite intensive search efforts. Meanwhile, a once highly touted competitor called the massive compact halo object, or MACHO — cheekily named in opposition to the WIMP — has fallen out of contention, its very existence debunked. Some newer long shots, meanwhile, are poised to give the dark matter thoroughbreds a run for their money. 

The stakes couldn’t be higher: If any candidate makes it to the winner’s circle, it would deliver a sweeping rewrite of how the universe works on the most fundamental levels. At this pivotal stage in the race, here is a breakdown of the Dark Matter Derby’s slate of entrants, from front-runners to (ahem) dark horses.

Particle masses are measured in units called gigaelectron volts, or GeV. A regular ol’ proton weighs a bit shy of 1 GeV, electrons measure 0.0005 GeV and the heaviest known particle — something called a top quark — tips the scales at 172.9 GeV.

Particle: Weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs)

Year proposed: 1985  Mass: 1 to 1000 GeV

When it comes to dark matter, physicists have placed their biggest bets, in terms of research dollars, on WIMPs. These entities surged to the fore in the mid-1980s, connecting the largest, cosmic scale of physics with the smallest, the standard model of particle physics. 

Developed over many decades, the standard model is a stunning scientific success. With pinpoint precision, it describes three of nature’s four forces — electromagnetic, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. But the model also has yawning gaps, including not being able to describe the fourth force, gravity, and failing to explain dark matter at all.

The XENON1T experiment in Italy aimed to detect the leading candidate for dark matter: weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs. An enormous water tank and three-story controls help make possible the extreme conditions necessary for the detector itself, which cools xenon to a liquid in the hopes of interacting with a WIMP. (Credit: Xenon Collaboration)

A refinement of the standard model called supersymmetry smooths over many of its flaws. It fills the gaps by proposing new, heavier partner particles for all known particles. Plug these new heavies into the mix, and, voilà, their total mass strikingly matches the estimates for dark matter. Cosmologists had already been kicking around the idea of WIMPs without knowing what they might be, and suddenly they had a match. Assuming supersymmetry’s heavier partners were WIMPs resolved everything so perfectly, researchers dubbed it the “WIMP miracle.” Conveniently, these WIMPs would interact with normal matter, albeit very weakly as their name implies; such interactions should render them eminently discoverable.

Emphasis on the should. Despite multiple big-budget experiments in 2016 and 2017, WIMPs have disappointed. And in May 2018, the XENON1T instrument in Italy — the biggest WIMP search to date — likewise reported finding nothing. In all three experiments, giant containers of liquid xenon served as dark matter dragnets, which would ideally, and occasionally, jostle some of the dark stuff we’re supposedly always swimming through, producing a telltale light.

WIMPs also have failed to appear in other detection methods. Theories suggest the particles may occasionally destroy each other or decay, resulting in showers of gamma rays, but searches have found no convincing evidence. And many physicists expected that the Large Hadron Collider — the most powerful particle accelerator ever built — would produce heavy, novel particles, including WIMPs. But a decade of operations with no heavy partners to show for it has instead made some physicists question the whole notion of supersymmetry.

The XENON1T detector. (Credit: Xenon Collaboration)

Even while the odds have lengthened for the once overwhelmingly favored horse in the Dark Matter Derby, WIMPs still lead the field. And more powerful WIMP hunters are in the works, including the Super Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (SuperCDMS).

“WIMPs are still a wonderful candidate,” says physicist Jodi Cooley of Southern Methodist University in Dallas, who works on SuperCDMS. “Some people are ready to throw WIMPs under the bus, but I don’t think you should do that quite yet.”

Particle: Axion

Year proposed: 1977  Mass: About 0.000000000000001 GeV

After a humble start, the axion is now surging in the race. Physicists originally came up with this particle to help fix a problem with the strong nuclear force, one of nature’s four fundamental forces. The problem is particles that feel the strong force are persnickety; they don’t behave differently when either their electric charges are switched, or they get flipped upside down. The standard model is perfectly cool with this, but it bothered researchers, so they came up with a way to explain that unusual rigidness. As a side effect, the explanation also suggested the universe may be full of new hypothetical particles called axions.

And, as it happens, axions also fit the bill for dark matter. Although the individual particles have a ridiculously low mass, the universe-forming Big Bang could have churned out axions in dizzying abundance — enough, in fact, to constitute all the dark matter in the cosmos. “A whole lot of the early universe’s energy gets dumped into these particles,” says University of Washington physicist Gray Rybka. “And because they don’t interact very much with anything else, you’d have all this leftover matter kicking about the universe.” Presto: dark matter!

To catch any fleeting axions, researchers at the Axion Dark Matter eXperiment at the University of Washington cool a cylinder to nearly absolute zero before it emits a strong magnetic field, which should transform the theoretical dark matter particles into radio waves. (Credit: Rakshya Khatiwanda/University of Washington)

Rybka is also co-spokesman for the Axion Dark Matter eXperiment (ADMX) at the University of Washington. Thanks to an upgrade announced in 2018, ADMX became the first device with the sensitivity necessary for nabbing those hyper-aloof axions. It’s not much to look at, just a 13-foot-long metal cylinder sunk into the floor, cooled to just above absolute zero to silence any signal-masking perturbations. 

Essentially, a magnet inside cranks out a powerful magnetic field that, according to theory, should convert any nearby axions into your standard radio waves. To detect these infinitesimal signals — roughly a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a watt each — ADMX has specially designed amplifiers. It’s the most sensitive radio receiver ever built. 

Researchers are presently “tuning” ADMX through millions of frequencies representing possible axion masses, rather like travelers driving out in the sticks, trying to alight upon the right radio station to catch a snippet of song. “We just keep turning the knob,” says Rybka. “It’s exciting because an axion discovery could come at any time.” The search is slated to continue for at least a few more years.

As for this dark matter dark horse’s name, credit MIT physicist Frank Wilczek. He coined it in the 1970s after randomly seeing Axion detergent — still manufactured today — on a store shelf. Like a sort of talisman, the ADMX team has ordered a bunch of the suds online. “We wash our hands with it for good luck,” says Rybka.

Particle: Sterile neutrino

Year proposed: Late 1970s Mass: Roughly 1 GeV

Once left in the dust as a dark matter candidate, the sterile neutrino has roared back into the race. It’s a hypothesized new type, or flavor, of neutrino. These ubiquitous particles currently come in three flavors and are all but oblivious to matter, passing clear through our bodies (and everything else) by the hundreds of trillions every second. But while everyday neutrinos will very occasionally touch matter via the weak nuclear force, the sterile neutrino would be even more hands-off; a clean freak, it never deigns to dirty itself with any interactions beyond gravity.

The idea of sterile neutrinos gained traction when an experiment in the 1990s recorded a strange excess of one flavor, called the electron neutrino, over the other two (now known to be muon and tau neutrinos, for those keeping track). The particles should have appeared in roughly equal numbers. Around that same time, though, experiments revealed that neutrinos transform from one flavor to another spontaneously as they flit about the universe. Theorists postulated that the flavor skew arose because some neutrinos were temporarily morphing into a fourth, sterile flavor before “returning” as garden variety electron neutrinos. When other observations ended up contradicting the idea, physicists summarily dismissed that lone result as an experimental fluke.

Just outside Chicago, Fermilab’s MiniBooNE detector is filled with mineral oil and tiny sensors. Researchers use the massive instrument, nearly 40 feet across, to spot faint flashes of light when neutrinos bump into an oil atom. The data may give way to a dark matter answer. (Credit: Fermilab)

Yet sterile neutrino advocates might just have the last laugh. In June 2018, a second experiment, christened MiniBooNE, found the same flavor excess based on a whopping 15 years’ worth of data. Housed at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory just outside Chicago, MiniBooNE is hardly mini. It’s a sensor-studded sphere measuring nearly 40 feet across, filled with over 800 tons of pure mineral oil. The instrument registers the flashes of light emitted on the rare occasions when neutrinos — produced in a nearby beam — bump into the oil’s constituent atoms. While it’s too soon to chalk up the observed flavor anomalies to sterile neutrinos, they do slot in nicely. “There’s clearly something going on, and it’s tantalizing,” says Richard Van de Water, a physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory and MiniBooNE co-spokesman.

Assuming sterile neutrinos prove legit, they are still likely neither sufficient in mass nor number to constitute the bulk of dark matter. But just as normal neutrinos come in three flavors, multiple kinds of sterile neutrinos, with different masses, may also exist. And going a step further, neutrinos may not be the only kind of particle with a sterile counterpart. Researchers have high hopes, in fact, that landing the sterile neutrino will crack the door open into a realm of new physics beyond the standard model, dramatically dubbed the dark sector. 

This shadow realm could be an entire “unstandard model,” full of particle types that invisibly interact with each other, all around us. Dark photons, dark gluons, dark quarks and more would be on the table. All could be repositories of the extra stuff in the universe we standard model-centric beings perceive as dark matter. “There has to be a connection somewhere between the dark sector and the standard model,” says Van de Water, “and sterile neutrinos could be it.” 

Multiple new teams hope to further suss out neutrinos’ weirdness with new projects. For their part, Van de Water and colleagues have started a fresh experiment at Los Alamos, called Coherent CAPTAIN-Mills. It uses chilled vats of argon to capture any telltale oscillations between flavors of neutrinos. Van de Water says the experiment could offer “smoking gun proof” of sterile neutrinos by early next decade, potentially blowing the dark matter search wide open. “If I were a betting man,” he says, “I’d say the odds are pretty good.”

Particle: Strongly interacting massive particles (SIMPs)

Year proposed: 2014  Mass: About 0.1 GeV

Could physicists be wagering on all the wrong dark matter horses? Hitoshi Murayama, a theoretical physicist at the University of California, Berkeley, thinks so. “There is actually something wrong with the traditional thinking about dark matter,” he says. Along with Yonit Hochberg at Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Murayama recently helped develop the SIMP (or strongly interacting massive particles), a whole new breed of dark matter particle. 

The top contenders — WIMPs, axions and sterile neutrinos — are all postulated as indivisible, elementary particles. SIMPs, on the other hand, are composite particles, made of other, smaller particles. “A SIMP is really similar to particles we have seen already,” says Murayama. “They’re sort of closer to home.” The most common examples of composite particles? Protons and neutrons, which make up the normal matter around us.

The SuperKEKB accelerator in Japan smashes together particles and antiparticles. Physicists hope to find a dark matter candidate among the debris such crashes produce. (Credit: Shota Takahashi/KEK)

The smaller bits making up protons, neutrons and SIMPs are called quarks, but in the SIMP’s case, they would be individually composed of a quark paired with a hypothetical antiquark, which primarily goes about its business in the dark sector beyond the standard model. Still, the physics of composite particles is well understood, and that degree of familiarity could make SIMPs easier to detect and understand than the more exotic indivisible dark matter candidates. 

SIMPs would be gregarious by nature, strongly interacting with other SIMPs. That’s in contrast to WIMPs, which only weakly interact with each other and normal matter. As a result, instead of WIMPily flowing past their fellow particles, SIMPs would knock heads and bounce off one another like billiard balls.

Dark matter behaving in this boisterous manner would help explain two key astronomical observations that buck against WIMPs. The first concerns some colliding galaxies: In one example, astronomers inferred that a great amount of dark matter had detached from its host galaxies in a celestial smashup happening some 1.4 billion light-years away. This suggests the dark stuff pushes against itself and cannot readily flow together with the visible stars and gas as WIMPs should. However, a second analysis using more accurate measurements now suggests perhaps the dark matter may not have separated from its galaxies after all — nothing can ever be simple in the dark matter business.

The second puzzling observation involves the screwy distribution of dark matter within smaller galaxies. Computer simulations show that due to gravity, WIMPs should glom together, forming dense clumps of dark matter in the centers of galaxies; they should also coalesce into chunks out in space. Yet observations clash with those predictions. Galactically, dark matter seems too evenly spread out, and astronomers have never found the chunks the WIMP model predicts. The findings better support a dark matter that doesn’t play nicely: the SIMP model. 

One more thing points to SIMPs. There should be enough of them to explain away all of the universe’s dark matter, unlike the more complicated theories other particles require. “SIMPs can be 100 percent of dark matter without any problems,” says Murayama. 

As for someday bagging SIMPs, hopes rest on particle accelerators such as the SuperKEKB, which started in Japan in April 2018. Such machines bang together lightweight electrons and their antimatter counterparts, and from the detritus might fling out the occasional SIMP. “That would be really cool,” says Murayama. A fair way to describe solving one of the biggest mysteries in physics. 

Lame Ducks and Dark Horses


In the late 1980s, scientists got their hopes up that MACHOs — gobs of normal matter that were simply dim and tough to detect — could answer the dark matter question. These objects would range from planets to failed stars to black holes. Unfortunately, well-supported Big Bang models struggle to produce anywhere near enough regular matter for MACHOs to fill the cosmic ledger. More damningly, observations have consistently ruled out any vast populations of clandestine black holes, which should give themselves away when their gravity bends background starlight. An October 2018 study took out the last leg for MACHOs to stand on, putting serious constraints on the possibility of primordial black holes — hypothetical monsters born in the early universe — being the last plausible reservoir of significant unaccounted-for matter. Whatever the bulk of dark matter may be, MACHOs ain’t it.

WIMPs, SIMPs . . . and GIMPs?

The only force definitely felt by both matter and dark matter is gravity. Accordingly, some researchers have created gravity-only models of the dark stuff, dubbed GIMPs: gravitationally interacting massive particles. 

One of the concepts isn’t new to physics — it simply submits that black holes actually have all that missing dark matter bound up within them and act in essence like ginormous particles. 

Alternatively, physicists have conjured GIMPs as elementary particles required by theories of our universe that include an extra fifth spatial dimension. Best we can tell, though, there’s still just the three, plus time. 

Perhaps the wildest horse in this herd, though, is Planckian interacting dark matter (PIDM). It consists of individual particles that each could weigh as much as 10 quadrillion protons. PIDM that spawned in the early universe should have left an indelible imprint on the Big Bang’s relic afterglow, called the cosmic microwave background, which researchers study for clues about the universe’s origins. Next-generation instruments could be sensitive enough to answer whether this dark matter horse wins it all — or needs to be put out to pasture.

Adam Hadhazy is a freelance science writer based in New Jersey. This story originally appeared in print as "The Dark Matter Derby."

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!


Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 Kalmbach Media Co.