Stay Curious

SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER AND UNLOCK ONE MORE ARTICLE FOR FREE.

Sign Up

VIEW OUR Privacy Policy


Discover Magazine Logo

WANT MORE? KEEP READING FOR AS LOW AS $1.99!

Subscribe

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

FIND MY SUBSCRIPTION
Advertisement

Go Read Phil.

Phil Plait responds to Amitai Etzioni's claim that NASA needs to knock down its ambitions about life-sustaining planets. Read more!

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

Phil Plait has a righteous takedown of a recent editorial by Amitai Etzioni in the Huffington Post. Etzioni argues that Obama needs to knock NASA down a peg or two because...um...well....because he thinks oceans are more interesting than planets, and because NASA's publicity machine runs towards hyperbole. More or less. Take it away Phil:

Dude. Seriously? The question of whether we are alone in the Universe, and even if there are other planets capable of sustaining life, is certainly deeply ingrained in our minds. This is one of the biggest remaining unanswered philosophical questions in science! For Etzioni to poopoo it is not only insulting, but so egregiously wrong-headed that it boggles my own mind.

A second bright spot (beyond watching Phil vivisect one of "the top 100 American intellectuals") is the comment thread, which is much more sensible and well-reasoned than the original article.

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe
Advertisement

0 Free Articles