Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

Age of Mars Questioned

By Alex StoneJuly 24, 2005 5:00 AM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

High-resolution images from the Mars Global Surveyor are throwing into doubt conventional assumptions about the Red Planet’s craters.

For years astronomers believed they accumulated over long periods of time as the planet was repeatedly hit by small meteors. Therefore, the more craters, the older the planet must be. New images indicate that most of the cavities are secondary impacts from rocks kicked up when large asteroids hit. “Most of the craters are highly nonuniform in how they are distributed across the planet,” says planetary geologist Alfred McEwen of the University of Arizona in Tucson. “The surface can go from being free of craters to being full of craters in an instant,” he says. The upshot is that despite its pockmarked appearance, the surface of Mars may be hundreds of millions of years younger than previously thought.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In