Stay Curious

SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER AND UNLOCK ONE MORE ARTICLE FOR FREE.

Sign Up

VIEW OUR Privacy Policy


Discover Magazine Logo

WANT MORE? KEEP READING FOR AS LOW AS $1.99!

Subscribe

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

FIND MY SUBSCRIPTION
Advertisement

Is Sexing Up Scientists All That Bad?

Explore how forensic science on TV, especially in CSI, influences jurors and affects real-world law enforcement.

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

I've previously raised discussion (see e.g. here) about the benefits of protrayal of science, scientists, and the scientific process on TV before, in both fictional and non-fictional settings. Sadly, one of the best (and only) examples of a (fiction) show which does that in recent times has been Crime Scene Investigation (CSI), a show about forensic scientists. Now, I've never seen more than about two episodes of this (and those soon after its launch) but apparently it is now very popular indeed. I can't help but think that this is potentially positive (for several reasons I've spoken about before), depending upon exactly how the writing is done, etc... (Others of you can (and no doubt will) comment, having seen it. Please do. I have no opinion since I do not watch it.) Anyway, note:

Forensic science's spell in the limelight has given it huge kudos. Glitzy TV shows like CSI: ...

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe
Advertisement

0 Free Articles