We have completed maintenance on DiscoverMagazine.com and action may be required on your account. Learn More

Speaking of EPA Action on Global Warming....

The Intersection
By Chris Mooney
Apr 16, 2009 11:58 PMNov 5, 2019 10:27 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

The folks at the National Wildlife Federation blog seem to think that a decision that carbon dioxide "endangers" public health and welfare under the Clean Air Act could emerge from the Environmental Protection Agency any day now. They call such a decision a "game changer." In my latest column for Science Progress, I depicted EPA action as one of the "knobs" that we can use to fine-tune climate policy; a so-called "endangerment" finding would be equivalent to throwing that knob to full blast, because it basically requires EPA to start putting in place restrictions on CO2. Certainly it will heighten the debate that you can already sense brewing here over whether letting EPA lead on climate policy, while Congress drags its feet, is a good idea.

On the pro side: Could make industry groups, like the Climate Action Partnership, lobby Congress for a cap and trade bill to be passed. On the con side: Could make Republicans salivate at the idea of hammering the administration during the mid-term elections for EPA's rouge economy-destroying behavior, thus fanning the flames of GOP obstructionism. (The John Fleck position.)

Which side do you folks think has the better case?

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!


Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 Kalmbach Media Co.