Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Environment

Rescuing Archaeologists

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

How's this for a bewitching paradox: the global economic meltdown is good for archaeology, bad for archaeologists. Huh? Consider this truism, as stated in a recent article in Antiquity, a UK journal:

The principal threat to the archaeological resource is and has been land use change through development, primarily for housing and infrastructure.

So it follows that a screeching halt in the construction of houses and shopping centers is good for archaeological preservation. But since most archaeology gets done because of this development, that means archaeologists are going begging. That's right, the field of archaeology is just as vulnerable as everyone else to economic boom and bust cycles. The Antiquity article by Kenneth Aitchison discusses the dilemma and possible solutions. It's a must read for commercial archaeologists in the U.S.-- those excavators and surveyors for hire that belong to a private industry otherwise known as Cultural Resources Management (CRM). Here's the problem:

Given archaeology's relationship with construction and development, it would appear that the only prospect of an improvement in the industry's situation will be through a revival of that sector.

That's not happening anytime soon. But Aitchison sees a silver lining for CRM archaeologists who want to stay gainfully employed until the economy bounces back:

The quantity of archaeological work undertaken over the last two decades has been driven by the mantra of 'preservation by record'. This has meant that as sites have been excavated, the archaeological resource has been transformed into data. We may be able to treat the reduction in the amount of fieldwork being undertaken as an opportunity to take stock of the data that we have accumulated and to think synthetically and strategically about converting that data into better understanding of human lives in the past.

Now that's what I call Rescue Archaeology.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In