Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Environment

Neil Tyson's Advice to Young Science Communicators

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

neil_degrasse_tyson_011.jpg

When you get the opportunity to interview a guest like Neil deGrasse Tyson--as I did on the latest Point of Inquiry--you don't want to waste it. So as a science communication trainer, I definitely wanted to hear his take on what young scientists ought to do if they want to become like...him. It's a tall order, maybe, but there's certainly a way for some of then to become prominent public communicators. Tyson's central point, however, is that the pathway will be different for different people--but it all comes back to knowing how to write. From about minute 28:15, with some ellipses:

It's not a predetermined path....Look at for example Phil Plait. Phil Plait is a professional astrophysicist, and then he had a blog, and the blog became a book, and a lot of interest in the book, and he saw the need for skepticism to be addressed in society, and he became a big part of that movement--you don't pre-script that. It's hard to prescript it. My career path--you just don't pre-script it. You do what you do best, and what you like the most, and you figure out along the way how that best fits into the opportunities of culture and the greater society. So in graduate school, I wrote a question and answer column for StarDate magazine, out of the University of Texas, and that became a book, and when you have a book, TV shows want your views on things--one thing leads to another. But in all cases, the common denominator is that it starts out by writing. So my advice to someone who wanted to be a science communicator is, you write. Writing is the excuse you can give yourself to organize ideas in coherent sentences in ways that make sense not only word to word, but sentence to sentence and paragraph to paragraph. And that is the art of communication, being clear and succinct. And the proving ground for that is writing. Today, blogs--if you get a popular blog, you can gain some weight in that way, and in an earlier day, I would have said you write op-eds, letters to the editor. A way to get your name out there with your point of view, that others might not have. But regardless, it's writing. And initially, you're not paid for the writing, you're just writing because you can't not write, or because the urge is so strong you just have to. And eventually, people take notice, if you say interesting things and you say them well, or humorously, or perceptively, then others take notice of it, and one thing leads to another. So you can't pre-script it, you just have to do what feels right, and express what inspires you, and then watch where the chips fall at that point.

I can't tell you how true this is to my own experience....seriously, this is just about the best advice I've ever heard on the subject. Tyson's words are also going to help me out a lot in sessions where I'm trying to get scientists to try out blogging and social media, and I constantly get the question: Why should I? Isn't this a great big waste of time? Well, no. And Tyson has just effortlessly and memorably explained why. (Again, you can listen to the rest of the show here.)

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In