Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Environment

Dumping Iron Into the Ocean Might Not Save the Climate, After All

80beatsBy Eliza StricklandJanuary 29, 2009 3:36 AM
iron-fertilization-2.jpg

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

One of the most controversial geoengineering schemes that has been proposed to slow the course of global warming, ocean fertilization, received mixed reviews from a new study. The idea involves dumping iron into the ocean to nourish plankton and spur enormous blooms, which would then die off and fall to the sea floor, bringing the carbon dioxide they'd absorbed with them. Now, researchers studying natural plankton blooms near Antarctica have new evidence to fuel the debate over the efficacy of the process, and whether or not it can get our planet out of hot water.

Scientists took measurements around the Crozet Islands, where there are naturally occurring fluxes in iron levels. To the north of the islands levels of iron are boosted each year as iron-rich volcanic rocks are eroded and the nutrients are carried off by the current [Times Online].

Researchers observed a huge plankton bloom there that covered an area the size of Ireland and lasted for more than two months, while also studying the water to the south of the islands, where the prevailing ocean currents don't carry dissolved iron and therefore plankton blooms don't form naturally. The results, to be published tomorrow in Nature [subscription required], showed

that iron-enriched waters do, as hoped, encourage more carbon to be stored on the ocean floor. But the efficiency of artificial iron fertilisation could be as much as 50 times lower than previous estimates [New Scientist].

Using sediment traps placed on the sea floor, researchers discovered that

three times as much carbon falls to the sea floor beneath a bloom as in "clear" waters. Sediment cores taken from the sea floor suggest the carbon stays there for thousands of years [New Scientist].

But as the quantity of trapped carbon was still considerably less than the estimates produced by some geoengineering proponents, researchers say the study raises serious questions about whether ocean fertilization can help mitigate global warming. Some experts say that artificial schemes could have a more dramatic effect, and that experiments are an obvious next step. Such arguments have immediate relevance because a team of German and Indian scientists aboard a research ship in the Southern Ocean are currently preparing to dump 20 tons of dissolved iron overboard. The experiment generated controversy because some scientists believe the iron's effects on the marine ecosystem aren't fully understood. However, marine scientist Andrew Watson says the new study should put critics minds at ease, as it shows that

"much larger amounts of iron are being added daily by natural processes around the Crozet Island, and it doesn't seem to have done the Antarctic ecosystem any harm" [The Guardian].

Related Content: 80beats: Experiment Trying to Create Algae Bloom Goes Ahead Despite Enviro Fears DISCOVER: 5 Most Radical Ways to Squelch a Climate Crisis (photo gallery) DISCOVER: Watery Grave profiles the scientists who thought up sequestering carbon in the ocean Image: R. T. Pollard

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In