Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


Carol Browner Departs the Obama Administration

The IntersectionBy Chris MooneyJanuary 25, 2011 6:21 PM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Little did I know, when I composed my somewhat cynical take on global warming and the upcoming State of the Union speech yesterday, that the chief White House figure charged with achieving climate change action would shortly be departing. Carol Browner is taking off, her chief mandate--a climate bill--unmet. There's no surer sign that nothing major is going to happen on global warming in the next two years--except maybe some brutal battles at the EPA. The president can adopt centrist, business friendly talking points and even get himself reelected in that way--but the climate system is another matter. It won't be waiting for anybody. Incidentally, a valued correspondent reminds me of a weakness in my last piece, in which I argued that the clean energy message was the right one for the president to adopt:

Don't get me wrong: I think climate scientists should communicate clearly about climate science to address the many misconceptions out there on the topic—and they’re becoming better and better at doing just that, in real time. I also think it's important to expose misinformation campaigns, and trace them to their corporate and think tank origins. But I’m not sure that presidents, environmental groups, and even some leaders of industry are wrong to focus on a message about clean energy innovation, rather than warnings of planetary climate instability.

The problem here is that there's no room left for talking about climate change adaptation, which is something that citizens, cities, and states have to be concerned with, but that gets left out of the "green jobs" message--and isn't an exclusively scientific matter either. There's a need for the government and president to lead on this subject. I may have more about that soon.

    3 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In