Stay Curious

SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER AND UNLOCK ONE MORE ARTICLE FOR FREE.

Sign Up

VIEW OUR Privacy Policy


Discover Magazine Logo

WANT MORE? KEEP READING FOR AS LOW AS $1.99!

Subscribe

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

FIND MY SUBSCRIPTION
Advertisement

The Verdict of the l'Aquila Earthquake Trial Sends the Wrong Message

The 2009 l'Aquila earthquake trial sparks debate on seismic risk assessment and geologic hazard mitigation strategies in Italy.

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

Rubble from a collapse house covered a car after the 2009 l'Aquila earthquake in Italy. Image: Alessandro Giangiulio / Flickr. By this time, many of you have seen the verdict for the people on trial over the 2009 l'Aquila earthquake. Judge Marco Billi sentenced the seven scientists, engineers and officials to 6 years in prison - 2 years more than the prosecution suggested - over the manslaughter charges stemming from the earthquake that killed over 300 people. The trial has been a flashpoint for geoscientists as many have seen it as a trial over the idea that geologists should be able to "predict" earthquakes. This is somewhat misleading as the prosecution was actually claiming the seven on trial were accused of "having carried out a superficial analysis of seismic risk and of having provided false reassurances to the public." This doesn't mean they got a "prediction" wrong, but rather that ...

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe
Advertisement

0 Free Articles