Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

What makes good sci-fi?

Gene ExpressionBy Razib KhanAugust 7, 2007 10:30 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

TNR has a piece by one of the writers for Buffy and the Vampire Slayer (and an assorted other sci-fi shows) about the appeal of some stories (e.g., Harry Potter) and the lack of others. Her basic thesis is that the story needs a "Chosen One" central spoke to anchor the axis of the narrative. That sounds fine, though I have to wonder why David Lynch's Dune tanked so much (just a bad film?). I don't have any grand theory for why sci-fi and science fiction are ghettoized in the norm but occasionally break out to become cultural phenomena. It seems like one of those stochastic "Tipping Point" dynamics which you know will happen, but don't know when. I will offer that in literary science fiction the boundary is pretty clear: any science fiction work which has widespread acclaim in the broader society isn't "really" science fiction. I've talked to people who have read Brave New World and Slaughter House Five and simply not understood what I was saying when I referred to those novels as science fiction. My high school English teacher told me that Brave New World was more a "dystopian classic." Yeah.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In