The Sciences

Is Our Representatives Learning?

The IntersectionBy Chris MooneyJun 18, 2008 5:35 PM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

My latest Science Progress column is up: It presents some ideas for improving the relationship between science and Congress other than the most obvious one--restoring the Office of Technology Assessment. The piece starts out like this:

First the good news: The number of physicists in Congress just increased dramatically. And now the bad: That increase was from 2 to 3. Still, if you plot the data, you can see the trend: As physicist Rush Holt (D-NJ) recently joked to The New York Times, "By mid-century, I think, we'll have a functioning majority." In all seriousness, though, to hear Holt and his fellow congressional equation solvers --Vern Ehlers (R-MI) and the recently elected Bill Foster (D-IL)--tell it, they are strangers in a truly strange land. Ehlers, for instance, relates having to occasionally rush to the floor to prevent fellow members from killing science programs they don't even understand--assuming, for instance, that "game theory" research involves sports, and that A.T.M. studies have something to do with banks (actually, this is a communications technology). Many people would probably agree that this gap between science and most of our elected representatives needs closing--but how to make that happen remains a complicated matter....

You can read the entire column here.

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month
Already a subscriber? Log In or Register
1 free articleSubscribe
Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%


Already a subscriber? Log In or Register
More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

To The Magazine

Save up to 70% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2021 Kalmbach Media Co.