Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

How the best science writers keep you enthralled

Not Exactly Rocket ScienceBy Ed YongApril 9, 2012 7:55 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

CarlZimmer.jpg

I make no secret of the fact that I am President of the Carl Zimmer fan club. Carl's writing was a big influence for me well before we became colleagues at Discover. So when Alok Jha at the Guardian asked me to write a piece analysing a great piece of science writing, I didn't have to search very hard. You can find that piece in the Guardian today. Consider it a (short and incomplete) guide to good science writing, and an ode to a peerless chum. It begins like this:

Scientific papers aren't known for their catchy titles. Here's a typical example: "Ancestral capture of syncytin-Car1, a fusogenic endogenous retroviral envelope gene involved in placentation and conserved in Carnivora." A good science writer could tell you what each of those technical words meant, or translate them into their everyday equivalents. They would also explain the concepts encapsulated by those words, and why they deserve your attention. And a great science writer might start with something like this: "If not for a virus, none of us would ever be born."

Photo by Russ Creech

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In