At the Speed of Light

What if Einstein was wrong?

By Tim Folger
Apr 1, 2003 6:00 AMNov 12, 2019 5:42 AM
Eclipses.jpg
Total solar eclipses, seen from Chile on April 16, 1893 (left) and from Mexico on March 7, 1970 (right), reveal the sun's powerful corona, streaming from its photosphere at temperatures of more than 1,000,000 degrees F. In 1919, observations of an eclipse from Brazil and the African island of Príncipe offered the first direct proof of Einstein's theory of general relativity. Now a young Portuguese physicist is challenging the underpinnings of that theory, as Einstein challenged Newton before him. | Linda Connor 2000 Lick Observatory Regents of University of California/Lick Observatory; NASA

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news
 

The day João Magueijo began to doubt Albert Einstein started inauspiciously. It was a rainy winter morning in 1995 at Cambridge University, where Magueijo was a research fellow in theoretical physics. He was tramping across a sodden soccer field, suffering from a hangover and mumbling to himself, when out of the gray a heretical idea brought him to a full stop: What if Einstein was wrong? What if, rather than being forever constant, the speed of light could change? Magueijo stood there in the downpour. What would that mean?

Until this strange notion intruded, Magueijo had been mulling over the most fateful moment in the history of the cosmos, an inconceivably brief instant between 10^-37 and 10^-34 second after the Big Bang. During that tiny interlude, most theorists agree, the universe exploded a second time, doubling in size over and over until a cosmos far smaller than a single proton grew to the size of a grapefruit. It has been expanding ever since, albeit at a more leisurely pace. Inflation, as that primordial growth spurt is called, has dominated cosmological theory for the past 20 years because it explains why the universe looks the way it does today.

But Magueijo never liked inflation theory. The idea that the universe expanded from a subatomic mote in less than a billionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second seemed unlikely at best to him, and there are obvious problems with the theory. It relies on a mysterious inflationary field and a weird antigravity particle called an inflaton, neither of which has ever been detected. Magueijo decided there must be a better explanation, and on that wet winter morning eight years ago, it came to him. Cosmologists wouldn't need to invoke inflation if they could bring themselves to give up one of their most sacrosanct laws: The speed of light is, was, and ever shall be 186,282 miles per second.

Magueijo now believes that for a few moments at the beginning of time, the universe's extreme heat made photons—particles of light—zip along much faster than 186,282 miles per second, at almost infinite velocities. Then, as the universe began to expand and cool, its physical properties abruptly changed, just as water suddenly transforms into ice at the freezing point. When the temperature dropped below a critical transition value, light "froze" at the lower speed we now observe.

"It's an act of brutality against the framework of physics," he admits. "You're conflicting with Einstein's theory of relativity—it's very line one. You have to be careful."

0 free articles left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

0 free articlesSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!

Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

Stay Curious

Sign up for our weekly newsletter and unlock one more article for free.

 

View our Privacy Policy


Want more?
Keep reading for as low as $1.99!


Log In or Register

Already a subscriber?
Find my Subscription

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Stay Curious
Join
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

 
Subscribe
To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 Kalmbach Media Co.