Advertisement

Vitamin D does a body good

Discover how Vitamin D deficiency is linked to a higher risk of death from cancer and other diseases. Explore the health benefits of Vitamin D.

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

I've spoken about Vitamin D a fair amount on this blog before. Not only have I presented it as a major selective pressure for light skin in the northern latitudes after the switch to agricultural lifestyles (and the concomitant nutrient deprivations due to reliance on a predominantly starch diet), but I recently found that I myself suffered from a lack. Though I eat a salad most days, and try to eat meats and fish, the fact that I have dark skin and live at a relatively high latitude and in a region characterized by cloudy winters was a combination which naturally led to low levels of synthesis. I'm taking supplements now, and plan on taking them for a long time. After I found out about my own deficiency I looked up some side effects. You all know about Rickets, but it turned out there were a host of global low level ailments that might be correlated with a lack of this nutrient. Now more evidence, Vitamin D Supplements Appear To Be Associated With Lower Risk Of Death:

Past studies have suggested that deficiencies in vitamin D might be associated with a higher risk of death from cancer, heart disease and diabetes--illnesses that account for 60 percent to 70 percent of deaths in high-income nations, according to background information in the article. "If the associations made between vitamin D and these conditions were consistent, then interventions effectively strengthening vitamin D status should result in reduced total mortality," the authors write. ... Over an average follow-up period of 5.7 years, 4,777 of the participants died. Individuals who took vitamin D had a 7 percent lower risk of death than those who did not. In the nine trials that collected blood samples, those who took supplements had an average 1.4- to 5.2-fold higher blood level of vitamin D than those who did not.

Of course, many of the diseases above hit late in life; evolutionarily they might not have been particularly salient (though I doubt that matters to do you if you are 65 and looking at a few extra healthy years). But I suspect that increased morbidity is simply the margin here, it probably has a non-trivial effect on basal physiological fitness.

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe
Advertisement

1 Free Article