True Blue

By Zach Zorich
Jul 24, 2005 5:00 AMNov 12, 2019 6:49 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

“Roses are red and violets are blue” has been more of a truism than botanists like to admit. For centuries they have tried to create a blue rose. That challenge has been reinvigorated by the tools that modern genetic engineers command. In November 1990, Discover first reported on efforts by an Australian company called Florigene (then Calgene) to turn roses blue by inserting a pigment-carrying gene from a bacterium. But the research failed to blossom. Undeterred, Florigene took a new approach that Discover reported in April last year, but major obstacles remained. Now, it seems, they’re getting closer. The secret? Florigene researchers had to splice a gene that produces the blue pigment delphinidin into rose DNA and also turn off the rose’s natural red pigment gene. The petals of this new rose are still too acidic to produce the blue color, which leaves the flower an uninspiring pale mauve. Still, the fact that they produced any blue pigment is significant.

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!


Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 Kalmbach Media Co.