Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Planet Earth

Should Humans Relocate Animals Threatened by Global Warming?

80beatsBy Eliza StricklandJuly 18, 2008 11:32 PM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Researchers have already noted that global warming is causing some species to shift their habitats, like mountain animals that are moving to higher latitudes to find the cooler temperatures that they're adapted for. But now some conservationists say it's time to consider relocating species that are threatened with extinction due to their rapidly changing habitats. It's a process called "assisted colonization."

Some researchers say that as the extinction rate zooms upwards, humans will have no choice but to step in to save some animals. "It's a showdown. The impacts of climate change on animals have become apparent. And it's time to decide whether we're going to do something," said ecologist Jessica Hellmann.... "Reducing CO2 is vital, but we might have to step in and intervene" [Wired News].

In an article in the science journal Science [subscription required], researchers say that humans would have to choose which animals to resettle, and they

offer a list of conditions under which such assisted colonization would be appropriate, including imminent extinction, feasibility and a favorable cost–benefit analysis [Scientific American].

They'd have to be careful not to cause more problems by dropping a new species into a ecosystem, explains s

tudy author Camille Parmesan: "Passively assisting coral reef migration may be acceptable, but transplanting polar bears to Antarctica, where they would likely drive native penguins to extinction, would not be acceptable" [AP].

Some conservationists are alarmed by the idea of assisted colonization, and say that we should focus our efforts on less desperate measures, like establishing wildlife corridors that could allow animals to move to more favorable terrain on their own. Others note that humans

have had a bad track record when it comes to moving species and disrupting environments. The introduced kudzu vine now chokes much of the U.S. South, and the noxious cane toad has spread successfully across Australia. That's why any movement should be modest—especially at first—and only employed for species that are well understood, experts say [National Geographic News].

Image: flickr/Livin-Lively

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In