Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Planet Earth

Darwin's Family May Have Paid a Price for Inbreeding

80beatsBy Eliza StricklandMay 5, 2010 2:04 AM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Charles_and_William_Darwin.jpg

Charles Darwin may have been right in worrying that the ill health that plagued his family were a result of inbreeding. Darwin didn't only marry his first cousin, Emma Wedgwood--in fact, the Darwins and the Wedgwoods made a habit of intermarrying (Darwin's maternal grandparents were also third cousins). Now a new study, which crunched the numbers on first-cousin marriages over four generations of the two dynasties, suggests that his children had an elevated risk of health problems.

The degree of inbreeding among Darwin’s children, while not excessive, was enough to increase the risk of recessive diseases — ones that occur if a harmful version of a gene is inherited from both parents. Three of his 10 children died before age 10 — 2 of bacterial diseases. Childhood mortality from bacterial infections is associated with inbreeding. So, too, is infertility, and three of Darwin’s children who had long marriages left no children [The New York Times].

The study (pdf), published in the journal BioScience, serves as an ironic footnote to the work of the great evolutionary biologist.

Charles Darwin's studies of heredity, adaptation and evolution included many experiments into the effects of crossbreeding and inbreeding in both plants and animals. Such consanguineous pairing often resulted in weaker, more sickly descendants [Scientific American].

And Darwin wasn't blind to the possible implications of his studies; in his letters he wrote of "the evil effects of close interbreeding" and worried that this problem might be playing out in his own family.

Other genetic researchers have argued in recent years that cousin marriages, which are banned in many parts of the world, don't actually pose enough of a health threat to justify the bans; but that argument dealt only with infrequent cousin marriages, not consistent patterns of inbreeding.

Related Content: 80beats: What Killed King Tut? Incest and Malaria, Study Says 80beats: Cousin Marriages May Be Taboo, but They’re Not Genetic Disasters 80beats: Darwin Goes Digital for 150th Anniversary of “On the Origin of Species” 80beats: Darwin’s Anti-Slavery Views May Have Guided His Theory of Evolution DISCOVER: Go Ahead, Kiss Your Cousin

Image: Wikimedia

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In