Stay Curious

SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER AND UNLOCK ONE MORE ARTICLE FOR FREE.

Sign Up

VIEW OUR Privacy Policy


Discover Magazine Logo

WANT MORE? KEEP READING FOR AS LOW AS $1.99!

Subscribe

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

FIND MY SUBSCRIPTION
Advertisement

New Analysis of Olive Branch Throws Ancient Timeline Into Question

New evidence challenges the dating of the Santorini eruption, suggesting the ancient olive branch may predate key events by decades.

ByCody Cottier

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sign Up

(Credit: Martin M303/Shutterstock)Scientists may have miscalculated the age of an olive branch that has served as a key piece of evidence in dating the Santorini eruption, according to a new study.The findings cast doubt on the accuracy of an analysis of the millennia-old branch, suggesting it may predate by several decades the natural disaster that fundamentally altered the political landscape of the Mediterranean and has been used to anchor much of the chronology of ancient history.

The conclusion that the branch dates to somewhere between 1,600 and 1,627 BCE — rather than 1,500 BCE, the date given by archaeologists — was based on the assumption that the outermost ring of an olive tree corresponds to the last year the tree was alive and growing. However, the new study contradicts this notion. After measuring the radiocarbon concentrations in 20 samples from the trunk of a modern tree, and another 11 from ...

  • Cody Cottier

    Cody Cottier is a freelance journalist for Discover Magazine, who frequently covers new scientific studies about animal behavior, human evolution, consciousness, astrophysics, and the environment. 

Stay Curious

JoinOur List

Sign up for our weekly science updates

View our Privacy Policy

SubscribeTo The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Subscribe
Advertisement

0 Free Articles