Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Mind

What’s Next, Climate Researchers Driving Hummers?

DiscoblogBy Melissa LafskyApril 23, 2008 10:31 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

books.JPG

Eric Schwitzgebel, an associate professor of philosophy at the University of California at Riverside, has written a paper, "Do Ethicists Steal More Books?" seeking to answer the timeless question of whether ethicists (i.e., people devoted to the study and philosophy of ethical codes) are concurrently more likely to hold themselves to higher standards of behavior (i.e., practice what they preach). His finding? Not so much. In his study, Schwitzgebel examined the number of ethics books missing from academic libraries, under the assumptions that a missing library book means that someone either lost or stole it, and that academic books on ethics are generally checked out by ethicists. After compiling a list of titles, he cross-checked it with the records of 13 U.S. and 19 British academic library systems, including the six University of California libraries, as well as those at Harvard, Cornell, Stanford, and Michigan. Each school's records reflected the same time period: October through December, so during the fall session. He found that the ethics titles were about 25 percent more likely to be missing than other philosophy books published in the same time period. The second time around, Schwitzgebel narrowed the list to "relatively obscure books most likely to be borrowed exclusively by professional ethicists and advanced students of ethics" and performed the same test. This time around, he measured two separate time periods: late December through early January, when school was not in session, and late February through early March, when school was in session. While there was a slight difference between the two time spans, he nonetheless found that the older books had a whopping 50 percent greater likelihood of being gone than other old and obscure philosophy books. In the future, Schwitzgebel hopes to also investigate whether existentialists are more likely to buy life insurance. This post has been appended.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In