Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


Lordotic Curve: Bringing Sexy Backs

D-briefBy Bill AndrewsOctober 30, 2017 11:08 PM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news


When the new release accompanying a science paper immediately alludes to lap dances and twerking, attention must be paid. That doesn’t happen all the time. And, incredibly, the study in question, which appeared last week in Evolutionary Psychological Science paper, actually lived up to the hype! It really does mention “female erotic lap dancers” and “twerking, which appears to be a simulated copulatory act, performed while dancing,” all in the service of mathematically determining just how sexy an arched back is. We get it; it's not curing cancer or devising methods to travel to deep space, but who are we to determine which questions are worth asking?

Sex Posturing

Let’s back up a moment. Biologists have long known that many mammals, from ferrets to primates, curved their spine a certain way when they were ready to procreate. That curve, the lordotic posture, also occurs in human women, when their hips pop out a little more and the lower spine curves toward the belly—too much curve, however, can be a problem. Perhaps, wondered study leader Farid Pazhoohi of the University of Minho in Portugal, when women took on the posture, it was a signal they might be up for some action? To test this, Pazhoohi’s team gathered 82 undergraduate men and women and showed them the upper bodies of six computer-generated women with differing back postures, and each in three viewing angles (front, side, behind). Amusingly, they used a simple sine wave (y = a*sin(x)) to model the back curves on their CG models, keeping the a variable within actually possible body shapes.


I only read Evolutionary Psychological Science for the articles, honest! (Credit: Pazhoohi, et al.) Each of the 82 participants (heterosexuals all, the study points out) rated which models were most attractive, using the 1-10 scale, natch. The researchers also tracked subjects’ eye movements, which the paper notes is “considered a robust method to study human physical attractiveness.”

Hot or Not?

And what were the results? Pretty much what you’d expect. Curvier backsides did indeed get higher marks. The front side view, which didn’t show off the goods quite as much, got the lowest relative scores. Men overall rated everything more highly. The eyeball tracking backed this up mostly, with all participants generally staring longer at the models’ backsides, though men seemed to linger on the hips while women focused on the waist. So yes, basically, everyone apparently finds arched backs more attractive. Pazhoohi and colleagues argue that this is consistent with their hypothesis that a nice curvy back is an indication that a human female is ready for procreation, though they stop short of stating it outright. Still, it looks like the arched backs aren’t the only ones ready for a stretch here.

    3 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 50%


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In