Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Mind

Are we in love yet? How about now? No? What about now?

Seriously, Science?By Seriously ScienceJune 19, 2013 7:00 PM
6474952633_d8e379ff3a-300x199.jpg

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Photo: flickr/Quinn DombrowskiAccording to pop psychology, one of the best tools for achieving a goal is monitoring one's progress towards that goal. But what if your goal is to become emotionally close to another person? Can obsessing about how close you feel towards someone interfere with your ability to actually feel close? To test this idea, these scientists had first year undergraduate psychology students talk to each other, and had some of them rate how close they felt every five minutes. It turns out that checking in with their feelings regularly didn't help them feel closer, and in fact, made it worse. Perhaps this is something to keep in mind on a first date.An ironic effect of monitoring closeness. "Most theories of goal pursuit underscore the beneficial consequences of monitoring progress towards goals. However, effects of affect labelling and dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness suggest that monitoring may not always facilitate goal pursuit. We predicted that in the case of pursuing interpersonal closeness, intense monitoring of progress would have a detrimental effect. We tested this hypothesis with the intimate conversation procedure, adapted from Aron, Melinat, Aron, Vallone, and Bator (1997). Participants in the closeness-monitoring condition asked themselves every five minutes in the course of a 45-minute interaction with a partner whether they felt any closer to their partner, whereas participants in the control condition monitored the room temperature. As predicted, intense monitoring interfered with achieving a feeling of closeness, as measured by sitting distance between pair members following the intimate conversation procedure. We discuss the possibility that monitoring would also be detrimental for achieving other goals that are internal states."

monitoring_closeness.png

Related content: Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Why women like men in red cars. Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Sex Differences in Approaching Friends with Benefits Relationships. Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Finally, science weighs in: should you give it up on the first date?

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In