Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Health

The Nanopore footnote?

Gene ExpressionBy Razib KhanFebruary 18, 2012 12:56 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

The New York Times and Nature both have favorable reviews of Oxford Nanopore's showy claims at Advances in Genome Biology and Technology. If you don't know what I'm talking about, please see the twitter stream, or the post at Genomes Unzipped. A note of caution: look back at The New York Times reporting on Pacific Biosciences in early 2008 (the same author). Granted, the piece was more measured. The more glowing reporting this time around is a sign I think a reflection of the reduced skepticism to Oxford Nanopore's claims. But 4 years is a long time, and the "$1,000 dollar genome" is probably foregone conclusion in the next 6 months to 2 years, no matter the details. That's why I suspect that the specifics of this release will be a footnote due to the inevitable forces of technological progress, exciting as it is in the moment. The precise firm leading the charge, and the details of the technology, are of interest to nerds,

but the big picture is that mass-market personal genomics is coming, and soon.

How many people on the street can tell you the company which brought television to the mass audience?

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In