We have completed maintenance on DiscoverMagazine.com and action may be required on your account. Learn More

Plastic Chemical BPA Linked to Lower Sperm Count & Quality

By Jennifer Welsh
Oct 30, 2010 1:39 AMNov 19, 2019 9:57 PM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

A new study of 218 Chinese men found that even low levels of the controversial plastics chemical bisphenol A (BPA) can lower sperm quality and count. For the study, which was published in the journal Fertility and Sterility, researchers noted the participants' sperm quality and urine BPA levels over five years. When compared to participants without detectable levels of the chemical, men with BPA in their urine were three times more likely to have low quality sperm.

"This adds additional human evidence that BPA is bad," said [the study's first author] De-Kun Li.... "The general public should probably try to avoid exposure to BPA as much as they can." [Washington Post]

That's a tough order, because BPA is all over the place. It's found in everything from sports equipment to medical devices to the plastic lining in canned foods. Li's previous studies have shown sexual effects of high levels of BPA, including inducing impotence in male factory workers

exposed to it. Those studies were done with men exposed to about 50 times as much BPA as the average U.S. man, so the results might not apply to your average Joe. However, in the current study Li argues that the chemical didn't only have a detrimental effect on individuals with sky-high BPA levels. Even participants with low levels, comparable to the average American, had diminished sperm quality and count.

"The higher your exposure, the lower your sperm quality is," he said. [Washington Post]

Much of the controversy about BPA has focused on the question of what level of BPA exposure is safe. This study adds weight to the argument that the chemical is hazardous to everyday people.

"Evidence has indicated that for the past few decades, sperm counts have been declining in some human populations--and that this might be related to exposures to endocrine-disrupting chemicals such as BPA is very reasonable," [Gail] Prins said. "I strongly believe that the U.S. should take measures to reduce the use of this chemical, since levels build over time." [Live Science]

Canada must be feeling smug, since the country officially labeled the chemical as toxic

earlier this month, making it easier to ban it and reduce environmental exposure to the chemical. Related content: Discoblog: Warning All Competitive Male Cyclists: Less than 5% of Your Sperm May Be Normal

80beats: Study Finds BPA in Store Receipts; Health Effects as Yet Unclear

80beats: BPA-Heart Disease Link Confirmed, But Levels in People Have Declined

80beats: BPA Won’t Leave Public-Health Conversatio--or Your Body

80beats: More Bad News on BPA: Linked to Heart Disease and Diabetes in Humans

Image: Flickr/SantaRosa OLD SCHOOL

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!


Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 Kalmbach Media Co.