Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Health

Is medicine more "scientific" than physics?

Gene ExpressionBy Razib KhanApril 15, 2008 3:02 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Sheril pointed me to this data rich release of Science and Engineering Indicators. I was interested to see this table:

Table 7-12

Perceptions of scientific nature of various fields: 2006

(Percent)

Field

Very scientific

Pretty scientific

Not too scientific

Not at all scientific

Haven't heard of field

Don't know

Medicine81161----1

Biology702421--2

Physics69213124

Engineering4532117--4

Economics1635311313

Sociology84129986

Accounting13213132--3

History10213729--3

-- = ≤0.5% responded

NOTES: Responses to: How scientific is [field]? Detail may not add to total because of rounding.

SOURCE: University of Chicago, National Opinion Research Center, General Social Survey (2006). See appendix table 7-27.

Science and Engineering Indicators 2008

My first reaction is that this is gauging to some extent the prestige & familiarity of the typical American with these various fields. There is simply no way that medicine is more scientific than physics. Perhaps I have a very narrow view of what science is (e.g., prediction & precision), but it's an alternate universe where medicine is more scientific than physics, end of story. I would also argue that engineering is probably more scientific, on average, than medicine, though I think that is more contingent on debatable parameters of judgement. But I was curious about the social factors which might have shaped this perception. Table 7-27

has the goods. I've excised the important bits below the fold....

Characteristic Medicine Biology Physics Engineering

All adults3.813.683.683.21

Formal education

Less than High school 3.803.573.362.98

High school graduate 3.823.653.643.16

Baccalaureate 3.773.763.843.37

Graduate/professional 3.793.843.923.45

Science/mathematics education

Low 3.813.613.563.08

Middle 3.823.743.763.22

High 3.793.833.893.46

Family income (quartile)

Top 3.803.733.823.27

Second 3.843.683.713.27

Third 3.793.693.683.11

Bottom 3.773.603.533.17

Factual knowledge of science (quartile)

Top 3.803.843.903.43

Second 3.843.733.743.30

Third 3.803.603.613.07

Bottom 3.783.553.402.98

placeholder

The table is on a 0 to 4 scale; 4 ~ very scientific, and so forth. Notice something? Medicine is the only field where education, scientific knowledge, and income has no effect. Contrastingly, the higher the levels of these characteristics the more esteem non-medical fields are held in, and physics leaps to the first position. What's going on? It seems likely that the perception that medicine is very scientific is confounded with the very practical and day-to-day relevance of this field for the average person. After all, you would hope that medicine was very scientific! While almost everyone encounters a well educated doctor in the course of a year, very few people encounger physicists regularly. People have a general sense of what doctors do (though not necessarily what medical researchers do!), and in comparison to most professions it is very scientific.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In