Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Health

Eating in a cafeteria makes food taste worse.

lunch-ladies-300x226.jpg

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Photo: flickr/USDAgovLike real estate, when it comes to eating, it's all about location. In this study, the authors tested whether the "acceptability" ratings of pre-prepared food would vary when the food was served in different locations (restaurant, laboratory, cafeteria). Not surprisingly, the food in the restaurant was rated highest; however, more surprisingly, the food served in the cafeteria was rated lowest, even below the food in the laboratory (although the laboratory food was free, and as all grad students know, free food is good food). Perhaps the participants were still scarred after all of those bad school cafeteria meals?Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance. "In two independent demonstrations, pre-prepared food was served in different environments: first, identical prepared meals were served in both a training restaurant and in a student cafeteria; second, a prepared main dish was served in a food science laboratory class, and as part of an entire meal in two student cafeterias and in a training restaurant. In the training restaurants and in the student cafeterias, people selected and paid for their meals. The acceptability ratings of the food served varied across the three different environments in the following order: restaurant>laboratory>cafeteria. Differences in acceptance were attributed to contextual effects and the expectations they produce, actual product differences, and a number of possible covariates. Ratings of sensory attributes tended to mirror the acceptability effects. The difficulty of comparing contexts within actual food service systems is discussed."

cafeteria.png

Related content: NCBI ROFL: Eating behavior and obesity at Chinese buffets.

NCBI ROFL: An army of om nom nom.

NCBI ROFL: Do nachos count as a meal? Depends on which college student you ask.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In