Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Health

DNA Sampling of Innocent-Until-Proven-Guilty People Is on the Rise

dna-test.jpg

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

If you're arrested for a felony in the state of California, expect to give up a DNA sample. As of January 1, California police departments began taking and storing genetic samples from all adults arrested for felonies, regardless of whether they go on to charge those people with crimes, or whether the suspects are ultimately convicted. Meanwhile, the FBI and 15 states now collect DNA samples from immigrants who are detained, and 16 states store genetic samples from people found guilty of misdemeanors. The intent is to create a large genetic database that will allow police to solve more crimes, but critics say the cumulative effect may be unconstitutional. Criminal

justice experts cite Fourth Amendment privacy concerns and worry that the nation is becoming a genetic surveillance society.... “What we object to — and what the Constitution prohibits — is the indiscriminate taking of DNA for things like writing an insufficient funds check, shoplifting, drug convictions,” said Michael Risher, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union [The New York Times].

U.S. courts have generally agreed that law enforcement agencies have the right to take and store DNA samples from convicts and former convicts on parole, but they haven't yet weighed in on whether suspects (who are innocent until proven guilty) must give up DNA samples as well. In Europe, however, the courts are already wrestling with such cases. British police have been taking genetic samples upon arrest for years, but in December the European Court on Human Rights issued a legally binding decision stating that keeping DNA samples from people who have never been convicted of a crime is a violation of their right to a private life. Law enforcement agencies argue that taking genetic samples is akin to routine fingerprinting. Rock Harmon, an adviser to crime laboratories, also says that even if an innocent person's DNA winds up in a genetic database,

it would come to nothing without a crime scene sample to match it. “If you haven’t done anything wrong, you have nothing to fear,” he said [The New York Times].

Related Content: 80beats: European Court Says Police Can’t Keep DNA Samples from Innocent People 80beats: Fancy Fingerprinting Could Tell if You’ve Been Misbehaving Discoblog: DNA Cops Crack Down on Flower Theft and Other High Crimes Discoblog: Criminals, Beware: Your Name Might Be in Your DNA DISCOVER: Q & A with Eric Juengst—discusses the FBI’s genetic database Image: iStockphoto

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In