We have completed maintenance on DiscoverMagazine.com and action may be required on your account. Learn More

Brave new world faces the licensing cartel

Gene Expression
By Razib Khan
Sep 3, 2009 10:39 AMNov 5, 2019 9:41 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Dan MacArthur has a very good post, New York Times adopts medical establishment line on personal genomics:

The NY Times has an article entitled "Buyer beware of home DNA tests" that adopts the paternalistic party line of the medical establishment: taking DNA tests without a doctor's advice is hazardous to your health. Remarkably, the article acknowledges that qualified genetic counsellors are few and far between and that "most practicing physicians lack the knowledge and training in genetics to interpret [DNA tests] properly", and yet still suggests that customers should "take the findings to a qualified expert". Begging the question: which qualified expert should customers be taking their test results to?

The over-worked genetic counsellor who has enough on their plate dealing with serious genetic conditions without having to worry about a patient with a type 2 diabetes relative risk of 1.17?

Or the general practitioner who understands less about modern genetics than the typical DTC genetics customer?

Doctors are bad at using Bayes' Rule. There is no shame in that, it seems a human cognitive bias, but if you're a professional being paid a lot of money it's a different issue altogether.

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!


Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 Kalmbach Media Co.