Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Environment

The Mike Tidwell Dilemma, Part II

The IntersectionBy Chris MooneyNovember 1, 2007 9:00 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

RavagingTide.jpg

Last week I published a detailed critique of Maryland-based climate activist and writer Mike Tidwell's book The Ravaging Tide. This week, I have followed up with Part II: My explanation of why it is that I'm going after Tidwell even though he's on my own "team," so to speak. An excerpt:

In my view, what we need on global warming is not merely to energize the base of people who already agree with us, but to reach across the aisle and move conservatives as well. But the way that Tidwell frames the issue won't do that. To Tidwell, global warming is repeatedly depicted as a "Pandora's Box," set to unleash untold disasters upon the world. And so he tries to communicate on the issue by, in essence, scaring people--making them deathly afraid of devastating impacts like more intense hurricanes. The "ravaging" tide. The "death" of coastal cities. But there are at least two problems with this approach....

You can read the entire piece here. So far, no reply from Tidwell or his supporters.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In