Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Environment

The Economist: Anti-GMO Greens are "Unscientific and Dangerous"

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Over a year ago I wrote a piece for Slate entitled, "GMO opponents are the climate skeptics of the left." I pointed out that, when it came to biotechnology, certain environmentalists and supposed food safety advocates acted similar to those who denied the scientific consensus on global warming. Mark Lynas recently tweeted a good example of this:

No scientific consensus on GMOs! http://t.co/t6HL0rVppk No scientific consensus on climate change! http://t.co/gwERklHrWk#denialism — Mark Lynas (@mark_lynas) November 27, 2013

My Slate piece gave anti-GMO greens heartburn. It also didn't please climate skeptics. So I can well imagine how both groups will react to a new editorial in The Economist, which carries this subhead:

Greens say climate change deniers are unscientific and dangerous. So are greens who oppose GM crops.

The policy implications of GMO opposition, which is what the editorial is about, is something I plan to delve into in the near future. Also, as I mused several days ago, I don't think mainstream greens will be able to stay (mostly) silent on this issue for much longer.

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In