Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


One Small Step for Fish . . .

By Jocelyn SelimJuly 25, 2004 5:00 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

How did creatures climb out of the sea? A 370-million-year-old arm bone found in an ancient streambed in Pennsylvania is helping to answer one of evolution’s great questions. The three-inch humerus dates to when scientists believe lobe-finned fish gave rise to the earliest four-limbed creatures capable of crawling on land.


Illustration courtesy of Kalliopi Monoyios.

This fossil arm bone suggests that the first four-legged creatures did push-ups before they walked onto dry land.

“Fish have upper-arm bones, but it was thought that these early arms were used only as paddles,” says Neil Shubin, the University of Chicago paleontologist analyzing the find. Although the humerus of the unnamed Pennsylvania fossil resembles those of many types of contemporary fish, it seems adapted to a distinctly different, push-up motion. A series of ridges along the bone most likely provided attachment points for a set of powerful pectoral muscles. Flexing those muscles would have allowed the animal to brace itself against the current in a stream and to lift its head above the water in order to grab a breath of air.

Shubin deduces that the creature would have looked a bit like a two-foot-long salamander with massive limbs; it probably lived in shallow, plant-choked waters. Its similarity to its fully aquatic relatives implies that the push-up motion originally evolved among fish. Later fossils show a wide variety of shoulder structures, some of them more similar to those of today’s land animals, so the Pennsylvania creature is most likely not our direct ancestor. “It suggests there was an immense amount of diversity in the intermediary land and aquatic animals,” Shubin says, “which tells us evolution was less a stepwise progression than a lot of false starts.”

    3 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In