Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Environment

Forget Biofuel. Is Bioelectricity the Next Big Thing?

80beatsBy Eliza StricklandMay 8, 2009 8:14 PM
switchgrass.jpg

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

The fast growing plant switchgrass has been heralded as the next generation of biofuel stock: Unlike fertilizer-dependent corn, researchers say it's highly efficient to grow the grass and process it into ethanol. But a new study suggests that there's an even better use for switchgrass and other plants. Rather than turning them into ethanol to fill the gas tanks of cars, plants should be burned in power plants to generate "bioelectricity," which can power electric cars. Using a sophisticated computer analysis, researchers found that a

small sport utility vehicle could do 9,000 highway miles (14,484 km) on the energy produced from an acre of switchgrass converted into ethanol. But converting that biomass into electricity allowed a battery-powered SUV to get 14,000 miles (22,531 km) on the highway.... "One of the driving factors that lead to this result is that the electric motor is much more efficient than the internal combustion engine," said the lead author of the study, Elliott Campbell [Reuters].

In the study, published in Science, researchers note another advantage that bioelectricity has over biofuel. The carbon dioxide emissions from power plants that use switchgrass or other plants as fuel could theoretically be captured and stored, since the emissions come from a few smokestacks. But the carbon dioxide emissions created from burning biofuel can't be easily captured, since they come out of every car tailpipe on the road.

Biomass, even though it releases CO2 when burned, overall produces less carbon dioxide than do fossil fuels because plants grown to replenish the resource are assumed to reabsorb those emissions. Capture those combustion emissions instead and sequester them underground, and it would "result in a carbon-negative energy source that removes CO2 from the atmosphere" [Technology Review]

, the study's authors wrote. A bioelectric future for transportation would require a wide-spread adoption of electric cars, which are still very far from the automobile showrooms. But Campbell says that this is the perfect moment to make decisions about how to keep people moving in the 21st century, before all the ethanol plants and pipelines are built.

"We now have the opportunity to develop new technology for future transportation infrastructure.... If that infrastructure has a big renewable energy component, we need to understand what the most efficient energy source is" [Mercury News]

, he says. Related Content: 80beats: Salt-Loving Plants Could Provide Abundant Food—and Maybe Even Biofuel 80beats: Algae-Filled Greenhouses Aim to Take in CO2 and Turn out Biofuel 80beats: Backlash Over Biofuels Builds in Europe DISCOVER: The Second Coming of Biofuels DISCOVER: Life After Oil dives into the ethanol debate

Image: flickr / Doctor Swan

3 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In