Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

Environment

Do You Belong in the Hall of Shame?

Collide-a-ScapeBy Keith KloorSeptember 6, 2013 1:02 AM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Mark Lynas detonated a stink bomb on Twitter today:

Imagine an 'anti-science hall of shame' w. climate deniers & anti-GM activists side by side. e.g. Seralini vs Pat Michaels? Nominations? — Mark Lynas (@mark_lynas) September 5, 2013

While I have on occasion used the anti-science tag for eye-catching purposes (see here and here)--and have been rightfully taken to task for it--I'm not a fan of this one-size-fits-all label.

wevebeentagged-300x247.gif

In fact, I think it's problematic and explained why here:

I’m not so sure that the anti-science cudgel can be cleanly wielded by any one side. Aside from that, is it even constructive to do so? If we are to be fair and consistent, the tent under the anti-science banner should fit scores of people from across the political and ideological spectrum.

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In