So I’m curious to hear what climate skeptics think of James Delingpole’s shocking admission that he doesn’t have time to read peer reviewed climate science papers. (I think he said this with a straight face, too.) Delingpole said he relies instead on the “peer to peer” review that happens everyday on climate blogs. Well, no news there, I suppose.
But about those time-sucking peer reviewed journal papers. Anybody got a problem with Delingpole’s cavalier dismissal of them? I mean, it’s not like he’s a journalist, or something, right?
Calling Bishop Hill and Anthony Watts.
P.S. Go here for links to the BBC Science under Attack documentary.
