We have completed maintenance on DiscoverMagazine.com and action may be required on your account. Learn More

What If the Most Basic Thing We Know About Dinosaurs Is Wrong?

A proposal ditches the traditional dino family tree.

By Jon Tennant
Jan 24, 2018 12:00 AMMay 21, 2019 5:31 PM
DSC-B0218 07
Gabriel Lío


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

For the Past 130 years, paleontologists divided dinosaurs into two groups, based on a handful of anatomical features — a split they believe occurred early in the animals’ evolution more than 230 million years ago. The “lizard-hipped” saurischians comprised meat-eating theropods such as T. rex and long-necked, herbivorous sauropodomorphs, such as Diplodocus. On the other side of the divide, “bird-hipped” ornithischians included beaked plant-eaters such as Triceratops.

In March, however, Nature published a proposal that trashes the traditional family tree. Instead, researchers placed theropods with ornithischians, forming a group called Ornithoscelida, and put sauropodomorphs with the early and primitive herrerasaurs.

“Our new hypothesis has lots of exciting implications about when and where dinosaurs may have originated, as well as when feathers may have evolved,” says University of Cambridge paleontologist Matthew Baron, lead author of the study.

Not all researchers are so enthusiastic: A number of early dinosaur evolution experts have challenged the proposed reorganization. But even some of the critics are open-minded.

“I don’t think we can be quite sure whether the new or the traditional arrangement is correct,” says Steve Brusatte of the University of Edinburgh, “but new fossils will hopefully help us untangle it.”

Baron and colleagues aren’t waiting for new fossils to be found, however. In August, they published a reanalysis of Chilesaurus in Biology Letters. The dinosaur, first described in 2015 as a bizarre, herbivorous theropod, is actually a primitive ornithischian, according to the study — a placement that would strengthen the authors’ argument for rewriting the entire family tree.

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!


Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 Kalmbach Media Co.