Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

What Does It Take to Succeed in Science?

Neuroskeptic iconNeuroskepticBy NeuroskepticJanuary 18, 2020 12:00 AM
Einstein Patent Clerk - Alamy
Einstein's inspiration for general relativity struck while he was a patent clerk in Switzerland in 1907. (Credit: Heritage Image Partnership Ltd/Alamy Stock Photo)

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

I've been thinking lately about what personal characteristics are needed to succeed in academic science today. What does it take to publish top papers, win lots of grants and reach the top of the profession?

Many people would point to scientific ability, in other words the cognitive abilities needed to understand scientific concepts, design experiments, write papers and so on. In fact, to non-scientists, I suspect that ability seems like the most important factor in determining scientific success. Surely someone who is very good at science will end up doing very well in science?

But ability isn't all you need. I think that personality and emotional make-up is at least as important. Let's call this factor temperament.

To succeed in science requires hard, sustained work and hence calls on one's mental discipline. That, of course, is true of many jobs, but what I think makes science particularly demanding is that it involves a great deal of uncertainty, and the persistence of uncertainty over long periods. You might submit a paper upon which your career prospects rest, but you won't know whether it will be accepted for many months. You might start a new project which you hope will produce wonderful data, but it will be years before the results are in. The temperament that allows one to sustain enthusiasm and passion under uncertain conditions is a virtue which not everyone possesses.

Finally, I suspect that success in science often requires luck. Ability and temperament are necessary, but not sufficient, for advancement in science. A lucky guess can inspire a landmark experiment, and there are thousands of potential unlucky events that could wreck an otherwise brilliant idea, not all of which can be guarded against. Even from the very start of a career, I think luck is important. A new PhD student who finds themself in a successful and supportive lab is off to a great start. Of course, PhD students aren't assigned to labs at random, but there is a good degree of luck involved nonetheless. How many students have lost out on places in great labs just because another candidate happened to see that job advert and apply?

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In