Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

The Forecasted Collapse of a Fishery

The IntersectionBy Sheril KirshenbaumJuly 11, 2010 8:34 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

It could be the dams, fertilizers, pesticides, and related reduced food availability. It might have to do with the amount of water in the region, climate change, and poor regulation. Most likely, it's some combination of these factors compounded by widespread apathy about a population of chinook salmon off the coasts of Northern California--until it was too late. The Press Democrat quoted fisherman Al Vail:

“I never caught a fish,” he said. “I've never seen a year like this, and I've been fishing for 45 years.”

Sad, but is anyone surprised? Those with an eye to the fishery knew this news would come. The farmers, the environmentalists, the scientists, the fishermen, and much of the public observed and waited. Tragedy of the commons? Perhaps. Tragedy for the fishery and those involved in industry? Obviously. Next up... Blue Fin Tuna?

I'm reminded of Kurt on the fate of the planet in Man Without A Country: "We could have saved it, but we were too damn cheap and lazy."

bilde.jpg

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In