"... that leaves more than 14 million square miles left to explore"

Bad Astronomy
By Phil Plait
Dec 11, 2010 12:45 AMNov 20, 2019 1:02 AM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news
 

When you write something and put it out there into the world, you never know what will happen. It may get an interesting response, or it may drop like a stone off a cliff. And then sometimes you get something totally unexpected, like when Robert Krulwich wrote about Apollo 11 for NPR, and got a response from someone with some experience about it*. The response is fantastic, discussing why we need to continue to explore the Moon (see the title of this post!)... and though I have disagreed with the author of that response from time to time, he and I are %100 on the same wavelength here. Go read it.


^* It reminds me of when I first wrote about the Moon Hoax. I posted my description of Apollo 16, and how they had a hard time gauging distance on the Moon. A couple of days later, I got an email correcting me about one of the assumptions I had made... and it was from Apollo 16 lunar module pilot Charlie Duke!

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!

Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Stay Curious
Join
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

 
Subscribe
To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2025 LabX Media Group