Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

Rushmore, doubt less

Bad AstronomyBy Phil PlaitJanuary 27, 2011 6:00 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

mtrushmore1.jpg

You've almost certainly seen pictures of Mount Rushmore; it's a magnificent carving of the heads of four past US presidents, each almost 20 meters high. Located in South Dakota, it's in a national park and a big tourist attraction (and the scene of the finale of "North by Northwest"). But did you know it's evidence that man was intelligently designed? Well, it's certainly used that way by creationists proponents of Intelligent Design; no less a leading light of ID than William Dembski has used Mt. Rushmore as an example:

Intelligent design begins with a seemingly innocuous question: Can objects, even if nothing is known about how they arose, exhibit features that reliably signal the action of an intelligent cause? To see what’s at stake, consider Mount Rushmore. The evidence for Mount Rushmore’s design is direct—eyewitnesses saw the sculptor Gutzon Borglum spend the better part of his life designing and building this structure. But what if there were no direct evidence for Mount Rushmore’s design? What if humans went extinct and aliens, visiting the earth, discovered Mount Rushmore in substantially the same condition as it is now?

Well, I guess it depends if the aliens see vertically or horizontally, because look what happens if you turn the picture sideways:

mtrushmore2.jpg

Aha! Obviously, there's no way that this fifth face could have arisen naturally. After all, "eyewitnesses saw the sculptor... designing and building this structure"! Sorry, all my fellow scientists, skeptics, critical thinkers, and reality-based compadres. Dembski clearly has rock solid proof. Tip o' the jackhammer to Tucker Phelps.


Related posts: - The Discovery Institute has no shame - Louisiana: even more doomed - Intelligent Designers nonsense: part n - Irony thy name is ID - Astrology and ID sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G

2 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In