Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

Rick Santorum's Troubling Views on Science


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news


Former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum announced for president today. We just praised Mitt Romney here for his acceptance of climate science--and by the same token, there is much to criticize about Santorum's scientific views. Namely:

1. Santorum is an anti-evolution, "intelligent design" supporter who has written that ID "is a legitimate scientific theory that should be taught in science classes." It isn't, and it shouldn't. 2. Santorum is an opponent of embryonic stem cell research, and in his opposition, he cites other scientific avenues like adult stem cell research as an adequate substitute--despite the fact that scientists say we need to try all approaches, rather than limiting inquiry. Or as the International Society for Stem Cell Research puts it: "Research on human embryonic stem cells, somatic cell nuclear transfer, induced pluripotent state cells (iPS cells) and ‘adult’ or tissue-specific stem cells needs to continue in parallel. All are part of a research effort that seeks to expand our knowledge of how cells function, what fails in the disease process, and how the first stages of human development occur. It is this combined knowledge that will ultimately generate safe and effective therapies." 3. Santorum is a global warming skeptic. Witness this 2008 column in the Philadelphia Inquirer, claiming that "global temperatures have actually cooled over the last 10 years and are predicted to continue cooling over the next 10." No they aren't.

All of these positions are outside the scientific mainstream and, indeed, simply out of touch.

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In