Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

Neil Tyson's congressional testimony

Bad AstronomyBy Phil PlaitMarch 31, 2012 8:00 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

My old friend and colleague Neil Tyson has long been an advocate for exploration, for basic investment in science, and for pushing the boundaries of what we know and can do. In early March, he got a chance to make his stand official: he testified before the Senate. Here's what he said:

[embed width="610"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xhc25v0DpJc[/embed]

Not bad, not bad at all. His passion for this is clear, and his thinking true. There is a lot of room for the devil in the details -- he and I agree that doubling NASA's budget would be A Good Thing, but there would have to be a requisite increase in oversight, and many more administrative details. But that's not the point when you're talking to Congress about inspiration: you're there to inspire. He's trying to make a much larger point and not get bogged down in details. And his main point, I think, rings true. After all, "How much would you pay for the Universe?"


Related Posts: - Neil Tyson’s most astounding fact - Colbert on Tyson - Symphony of Science: Onward to the Edge - Great Tyson’s ghost!

3 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Register or Log In