Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

Keep hammering the antivaxxers!

Bad AstronomyBy Phil PlaitAugust 16, 2009 5:00 PM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

The Australian skeptics are still hammering away at Meryl Dorey, the Australian Vaccination Network, and their (to be charitable) distortions of the truth. It's nice to see. And what we have seen is that, like a pinata when that critical blow is made, a torrent of dumbosity comes out. Which brings up an interesting point. A lot of people think that using an ad hominem -- an argument that attacks the person and not the issue --is a logical fallacy. That's not necessarily the case. For example, if someone on the street walks up to me and say, "Aliens speaking with the voice of Glenn Beck are sitting on my shoulders and forcing me to eat brussel sprouts, and Obama's health care plan will set up death panels," then there is some merit in questioning the person's sanity before wondering if what they say about the health care plan is true. So if you're inclined to give Meryl Dorey and her AVN group the benefit of the doubt, you might want to read up on some of the other, um, stuff they believe. It may open your eyes.

    3 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In