Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

Gore vital

Bad AstronomyBy Phil PlaitMarch 1, 2010 1:46 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

I know mentioning Al Gore, let alone linking to him, is like throwing red meat into the pit of denialists, but Gore's Op Ed in today's New York Times is really quite good. I wonder if he reads my blog? He hits a lot of the points I have the past few days... though he doesn't mention the troglodytes in the South Dakota and Utah legislative bodies. The only point he makes I'm not sure about is the capping of carbon emissions, simply because I haven't looked into the issue. One more thing on my to-do list. Anyway, I will be much amused, I'm sure in a schadenfreudelicious sort of way, about the comments that will ensue below. I know! Let's make it a game! Score ten points for every comment that makes fun of "Inconvenient Truth" without addressing the content of the Op Ed, 20 points for anyone who clearly didn't read the Op Ed but comments anyway, 30 points for a comment thoroughly rebutted by science (either previously known or pointed out in a subsequent comment) but ignored by the commenter, and 100 points for someone who comments making fun of Gore's name. First person to 1000 points wins! What do you win? A planet 1° Fahrenheit warmer than it was a century ago! Hurray!

3 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In