We have completed maintenance on DiscoverMagazine.com and action may be required on your account. Learn More

Correction to last post about Uranus’ rings

Bad Astronomy
By Phil Plait
Dec 23, 2005 9:13 PMNov 5, 2019 6:48 AM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news
 

Well, nuts. I read the press release, did some follow-up, and still managed to make a mistake in this morning's post! The outer ring is probably caused by Mab. But instead of being formed in a collision, it appears to be more likely that the ring is due to continuous bombardment of meteoroids on Mab, which dislodge material and forms the ring. Some of that material is swept back up, but the two processes balance. It's like a sink which has the drain open but water coming in from the spigot; the water level stays the same, even though there is water flowing in and out of the sink. Where an old collision plays a role is in the inner ring, discovered recently as well. That one has no obvious supply of dust, but the ring doesn't look like it can last long (maybe a million years). So that is where there must by smaller moonlets, maybe a mile or so across, which are the source of dust through collisions. My mistake in the earlier post was to conflate these two things. I apologize. I hope this doesn't confuse people too much. If you want more info, try the SETI page which has more details.

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!

Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Join
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

 
Subscribe
To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 Kalmbach Media Co.