Are Scientists Who Blog Undercutting Professional Science Writers?

Neuroskeptic iconNeuroskeptic
By Neuroskeptic
Oct 29, 2013 1:21 AMNov 20, 2019 1:24 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Recent events have got me thinking about writing for free.

When I started out, I blogged for free. I did that for four years. Now Discover pay me some, but my day job as a neuroscientist pays the bills. Many other scientists blog, and I don't know any who didn't at least begin by writing for free. Honestly, I'm OK with that. For me, writing is its own reward (although money is nice). But what about people who do (try to) make a living from writing? Are they OK with it? Or are scientists who blog for free undercutting them? This is a worry of mine. Now this concern is based on the idea that science writing is some kind of zero-sum game - the idea that there's only so much work to be done, and that if some people do it for free, that means no-one gets paid for it. Is that an accurate description of the market? Surely not entirely, but maybe there's enough truth in it that my worry is not unfounded. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts in the comments.

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!


Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 Kalmbach Media Co.