Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

Are Scientists Who Blog Undercutting Professional Science Writers?

Neuroskeptic iconNeuroskepticBy NeuroskepticOctober 29, 2013 1:21 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Recent events have got me thinking about writing for free.


When I started out, I blogged for free. I did that for four years. Now Discover pay me some, but my day job as a neuroscientist pays the bills. Many other scientists blog, and I don't know any who didn't at least begin by writing for free. Honestly, I'm OK with that. For me, writing is its own reward (although money is nice). But what about people who do (try to) make a living from writing? Are they OK with it? Or are scientists who blog for free undercutting them? This is a worry of mine. Now this concern is based on the idea that science writing is some kind of zero-sum game - the idea that there's only so much work to be done, and that if some people do it for free, that means no-one gets paid for it. Is that an accurate description of the market? Surely not entirely, but maybe there's enough truth in it that my worry is not unfounded. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts in the comments.

    3 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 50%


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In