Register for an account

X

Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.

X

Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.

The Sciences

2011 Reader Survey: GNXXP vs. GNXYP edition

Gene ExpressionBy Razib KhanJuly 19, 2011 12:02 AM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

35.jpg

A typical female GNXP reader?

We've moved north of 400 responses

on the reader survey. I think the goal of an N of 500 is totally viable. In the past I've actually pushed it well north of 600 by leaving the survey open for a while. I know there are some people who drop in once a week or so, or don't have time or inclination to participate initially. If you want to participate:

just click here!

It will take ~10 minutes, and no answer is mandatory. There are already a few robust findings though. GNXP readers are well educated and smart. About 60-70 percent aver that they are irreligious, and 85 percent reject the existence of the supernatural. Over half have backgrounds in the natural sciences. None of this is too surprising. I've been taking surveys of the readership since 2004, and the main change has been in politics. Whereas in the mid-2000s libertarians were the largest contingent, now Left-liberals are, though there remains a sizable libertarian minority. One of the most consistent findings on this weblog has been the sex ratio: the proportion of female core readership is on the order of ~15%. Since moving to Discover it looks like that ~20% is the new set point. This shouldn't be too surprising...there are very few explicitly female handles in the comments. Though because of the male bias in the readership there's obviously going to be a natural tendency toward assigning implicit male identity to anonymous or gender ambiguous commenters when a substantial number will be female. Currently the most prominent female in the comments is Michelle

, who is a prominent science blogger

in her own right (pictured above). The very fact that I could type the previous sentence is a commentary on the sex ratio imbalance! A major reason I want to go north of 500 responses is that I can compare across two classes more easily. The smaller a sample size the greater the error. I'd be a lot more confident comparing those who believe in God vs. those who don't if I had more respondents who actually believed. But now that I'm at nearly 100 female respondents I thought it would be interesting to compare across the two sexes in terms of similarities and differences. First, let's compare the cross-tabs of sex by other variables in a table. You see below the percentage of males and females who fall into a particular class. So below you can see that 73 percent of males support abortion on demand vs. 82 percent of females. While 36 percent of male respondents have made a non-trivial edit to Wikipedia, only 12 percent of female respondents have.

VariableMaleFemale

Upper class41

Upper middle class3631

Middle Class4657

Lower middle class1216

Lower class20

Less than secondary school10

Secondary school20

Some university without completion or higher education less than bachelors degree1719

Bachelors degree2734

Masters degree (or equivalent)2530

Advanced degree (professional degree or doctorate)2817

Yes to abortion on demand7382

Accepts the existence of supernatural1319

ESTJ - Overseer23

ESFJ - Supporter11

ISTJ - Examiner1010

ISFJ - Defender01

ESTP - Persuader11

ESFP - Entertainer11

ISTP - Craftsman39

ISFP - Artist24

ENTJ - Chief40

ENTP - Originator101

INTJ - Strategist2928

INTP - Engineer2415

ENFJ - Mentor30

ENFP - Advocate21

INFJ - Confidant213

INFP - Dreamer77

Yes, has done recreational genomics2824

Conversant in programming language5635

Interested in transhumanism5036

Knows what narrow-sense heritability is3827

Have to be on guard against genetic determinism67

Genetic determinism is a concern, but often overblown5067

Genetic determinism is not a concern4426

Biologically derived behavioral differences between the sexes trivial314

Biologically derived behavioral differences between the sexes very modest1324

Biologically derived behavioral differences between the sexes somewhat significant5251

Biologically derived behavioral differences between the sexes very significant3311

Has made non-trivial edit to Wikipedia3612

Next I looked at the open ended questions. What's the difference in sexual partners? I'm not going to give you a chart here because what you see isn't too unexpected. Most people have less than 20 sexual partners, but a few people claim hundreds and even thousands of partners.

# of sex partners

MedianMeanStandard Deviation

Male415.568

Female411.826

Limited to < 50 sex partners

Male367.8

Female47.449.7

The median and mean are different because the mean is much more sensitive to outliers than the median. You see that there are some really promiscuous males who are driving the average up. So I decided to limit the sample to a more realistic range (for mortals). Interestingly you now see that female readers have somewhat more sexual partners than males! There are some obvious interpretations of what's going on here, but I'll leave it to you guys. Now let's look at the political orientations. Specifically, political liberalism and economic liberalism (Left-liberalism, I confirmed that most readers understood my attempt with cross-tabs on taxes). In the charts below blue = male and red = female.

sex_sociallibline.png

sex_econliblib.png

The differences are small. I'd expected a bigger difference on economic issues, but though males are more conservative, not especially so. I wanted to look at scatter plots, but the problem here is that there are only 10 discrete values on each dimension, so there's going to be a lot of overlap. So below you see plots where positions on the coordinate map are shaded in relation to how many individuals match that social and economic liberalism combination.

sex_politicsscatter.png

sex_politicss_male_scatter.png

sex_politicss_female_scatter.png

Just so you know, some people left their sex undefined, so that's why you see a match at 10 for economic liberalism and 0 for social liberalism on the non-sex differentiated plot, but not on the male and female ones. The readers of this weblog tend toward Left-liberalism, but not overwhelmingly so, with a large libertarian minority, and a non-trivial conservative one. Next let's look at how many years individuals have been reading Gene Expression. Here at the summary statistics:

Years read

MedianMeanStandard Deviation

Male33.22.4

Female12.41.8

Males have been reading much longer. I've long noticed greater "churn" among the female readership. The proportion of females is the same, but they tend to always report reading for not as long. This can be explained by women coming and going more often. Here's the density distribution with two curves, one for males and one for females:

sex_yearsread.png

Finally, is there a difference in self-reported IQs by sex? Not much:

Sex_IQdistribution1.png

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%

    Subscribe

    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In