Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


When Museums Get Political: New York Exhibit Targets Climate Change

Reality BaseBy Melissa LafskyOctober 21, 2008 12:34 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news


Seeing as global warming is a defining issue of our time and all, it's not a shock that museums would want to feature exhibits on the subject. But given that climate change is still (somewhat, on a dwindling basis) a politically-charged and controversial topic, what stance should a museum show take on the principal point of contention—specifically, whether or not the cause is mostly (or only) human activity? That's the dilemma that New York's famed American Museum of Natural History is flirting with in its new show, "Climate Change: The Threat to Life and A New Energy Future." The exhibition takes the definitive stance that human activities are primarily responsible for climate change. Museum curator Edmond Mathez, who first proposed the show several years ago, said the man-made direction was a deliberate move to educate the public on the real scientific consensus about climate change. Of course, it's unlikely Mathez could have foreseen that the show would open during a presidential election in which one side's VP nominee stomps on the very consensus the exhibit was built to promote—but then, all the more reason for an injection of fact into the public discourse. So what does the show look like? (While RB is located in Manhattan, we admit we haven't made the sojourn to the Upper West Side to see it.) According to Science Daily, the exhibit "examines causes and effects of climate change as well as possible ways to slow it down, such as boosting the use of nuclear, wind and solar power," with features like "interactive displays for visitors to pledge to make changes in their behavior, such as buying low-energy light bulbs, recycling waste or bicycling to work." And voting. Related: RB: Rumors Aside, Sarah Palin Is Still Butchering Science RB: Sarah Palin Still Butchering Science, Redux

Image: Flickr/John LeGear

    2 Free Articles Left

    Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

    Want unlimited access?

    Subscribe today and save 70%


    Already a subscriber? Register or Log In