Register for an account


Enter your name and email address below.

Your email address is used to log in and will not be shared or sold. Read our privacy policy.


Website access code

Enter your access code into the form field below.

If you are a Zinio, Nook, Kindle, Apple, or Google Play subscriber, you can enter your website access code to gain subscriber access. Your website access code is located in the upper right corner of the Table of Contents page of your digital edition.


Some M.D.s Try to Amputate Online Reviews

80beatsBy Eliza StricklandMarch 7, 2009 1:14 AM


Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news

Some doctors are so concerned about being negatively reviewed on Web sites like Yelp, RateMDs, and Angie's List that they are asking patients to sign gag orders that bar them from posting negative online reviews. A company called Medical Justice, which seeks to protect doctors against medical malpractice claims, advices doctors to have each patient sign the non-disclosure agreement--and if the patient refuses, to turn him away.

"Consumers and patients are hungry for good information" about doctors, but Internet reviews provide just the opposite, contends Dr. Jeffrey Segal, a North Carolina neurosurgeon [and the founder of Medical Justice]. Some sites "are little more than tabloid journalism without much interest in constructively improving practices," and their sniping comments can unfairly ruin a doctor's reputation, Segal said [AP].

About 2,000 doctors have signed up for the service since it was launched two years ago. Segal claims that privacy laws and medical ethics prevent doctors from defending themselves on the review sites. For each doctor customer, Medical Justice periodically checks review Web sites for the doctor's name, and compiles any negative reviews. Some sites, like Angie's List, know the names of all reviewers and will share them with doctors if asked.

If it finds comments submitted by a person who signed a waiver, the company produces the waiver and asks the site to take the comments down [Computer World].

But other review sites say that doctors should simply get used to having their services reviewed, just like every restaurant and hair salon has.

John Swapceinski, co-founder of, said that in recent months, six doctors have asked him to remove negative online comments based on patients' signed waivers. He has refused. "They're basically forcing the patients to choose between health care and their First Amendment rights, and I really find that repulsive," Swapceinski said. He said he's planning to post a "Wall of Shame" listing names of doctors who use patient waivers [AP].

Image: iStockphoto

3 Free Articles Left

Want it all? Get unlimited access when you subscribe.


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In

Want unlimited access?

Subscribe today and save 70%


Already a subscriber? Register or Log In